WalletDNA vs WalletWhitePages
Both are self-serve, both skip the sales call, and both hand you a PDF. The difference is the data underneath: WalletDNA infers risk from the blockchain, we index who the human behind the address is.
Free to search: see how much intelligence exists on an address. Unlock the full report to reveal the details.
373M+
Wallets tracked
1.1B+
Records indexed
100+
Intelligence sources
WalletDNA and WalletWhitePages get compared because we share a market position. Neither makes you book a demo, both are priced for individuals and small teams, and both exist because the enterprise platforms will not sell to you.
Where we diverge is the source of the data. WalletDNA's own description is precise about this: it uses "proprietary heuristics to cluster addresses, infer entities, and surface verifiable evidence", delivering risk scores, sanctions screening, VASP attribution, and fund-flow tracing across 18 chains. That is blockchain analytics in the classical sense, and it is on-chain inference.
We index the off-chain layer: who the address belongs to, drawn from 100+ intelligence sources across 373M+ wallets and 1.1B+ records. Different corpus, different question, different answer.
This is the distinction the whole comparison rests on, and it is worth being precise about because the vocabulary is confusingly similar.
On-chain entity attribution clusters addresses that behave as though one actor controls them, then labels the cluster by matching it against known deposit addresses and service patterns. Done well, it tells you that an address belongs to a particular exchange, a mixer, a bridge, a darknet market, or a sanctioned entity. That is genuinely valuable, and it is what risk scores are built from.
What it does not produce is a person. "This address deposited to Binance" is an entity attribution. "This address belongs to someone using this name, this email, these social profiles, and reported by fourteen victims" is an identity. No amount of on-chain clustering yields the second, because the information is not on the chain. It is in breach corpora, social graphs, exchange leaks, court filings, public records, scam report databases, and the hundred-odd other sources we index.
This is also why the most common question people actually have, how do we know whose wallet it is, has never had a good on-chain answer.
We would rather you hear this from us than discover it later. WalletDNA covers 18 blockchains by its own count, which is more than we do. It offers fund-flow tracing through an investigation canvas, mapping a trail hop by hop to where funds cashed out, and we do not offer tracing at all. Its published tiers include API access, bulk analysis, webhooks, white-label PDF templates, and Telegram delivery alongside email.
It also screens against OFAC, EU, and UK sanctions lists, where our sanctions coverage centres on OFAC. If your work is European or UK-facing compliance, that breadth is a real advantage.
So if your question is "where did this money go" or "what is this address exposed to", WalletDNA is built for that and we are not. Use it.
Our corpus is the whole argument: 100+ intelligence sources, 373M+ wallets, 1.1B+ records. That is not a tracing graph, it is an identity index. When a wallet has off-chain data attached to it, we have it: names, aliases, email addresses and contact details, social and messaging profiles, linked exchange accounts, related wallets, and the scam reports other victims have filed, each with its source cited so you can check it.
Monitoring is the second place we win outright, and it is a bigger gap than it looks. WalletDNA monitors 25 wallets on its Pro tier and 300 on Advanced at $499 a month. Our Pro is $40 a month for unlimited wallet monitoring, and five wallets are free forever.
The alerts are also about different events. Transaction and risk-score alerts tell you the on-chain picture moved. Ours tell you the human picture moved: a new name linked, a fresh scam report filed, a social profile connected, a sanctions listing added. If you are trying to identify someone rather than watch their balance, that is the feed you want.
Use WalletDNA if you need to trace funds across hops, produce a risk score for a compliance file, screen against EU or UK sanctions, or work through an API at volume.
Use WalletWhitePages if you need to know who is behind an address, want the off-chain identity and reputation record rather than an on-chain risk number, or need to watch a large number of addresses for new intelligence without paying per wallet.
Use both if you are running a real investigation. They are complementary rather than competing, and the honest answer is that a serious case wants the money trail and the identity file. Searching here is free, so adding us costs nothing to try.
WalletDNA is on-chain analytics: it clusters addresses, infers entities, scores risk, and traces fund flows across 18 chains. WalletWhitePages is an off-chain identity index: names, aliases, social profiles, contact details, linked accounts, and victim reports from 100+ sources across 373M+ wallets. One tells you where the money went, the other tells you who the person is.
For fund tracing, chain coverage, API workflows, and EU or UK sanctions screening, yes, and we would say so rather than pretend otherwise. For identifying the human behind an address, and for monitoring many addresses without a per-wallet cap, we are. They are different products that look similar from the outside.
It depends entirely on what you do. For a single report we are $19.99 and searching is free. For high-volume automated analysis their top-up packs work out cheaper per report. For monitoring a lot of addresses we are dramatically cheaper, because our $40 Pro tier is unlimited while their Pro monitors 25 wallets.
For a serious investigation, probably. Tracing tells you where funds moved; identity tells you who moved them. Since searching here is free, the cheapest way to find out whether our data adds anything to your case is to paste the address and look.
No, and we would not recommend using it as one. If you are a regulated exchange, bank, or payment firm that needs continuous transaction screening, audit trails, and a vendor your regulator already recognises, buy one of the enterprise platforms. WalletWhitePages is for people and small teams who need an answer about a specific wallet without a procurement cycle.
Ours are on our pricing page: free to search and monitor five wallets, $19.99 for a single full report, or $40 a month for ten report credits plus unlimited wallet monitoring. Theirs are quoted from documents they published themselves, and we link to each one. Where a vendor publishes no price at all, we say that instead of repeating a third-party estimate, because those estimates disagree with each other enormously.
They tell you when the intelligence on a wallet changes, not when its balance does. A new scam report filed by another victim, a newly linked name or alias, a social or exchange account tied to the address, a fresh sanctions listing. Tools that alert on transactions tell you money moved. Ours tell you something new was learned about who is behind the address.
No. There is no demo, no discovery call, and no order form. You paste a wallet address and get results. A free account adds monitoring for up to five wallets and costs nothing.
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, Solana, Litecoin, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, XRP, Dogecoin, Avalanche, and more. The enterprise platforms generally cover more chains than we do, and if exhaustive chain coverage is your requirement, that is a real reason to choose them.